mHM issueshttps://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/issues2024-02-27T14:13:36+01:00https://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/issues/255Checks: MPI problems with case 04, 05, 07 and 112024-02-27T14:13:36+01:00Sebastian MüllerChecks: MPI problems with case 04, 05, 07 and 11- case 05 and 07 don't work with MPI in general as the used objective functions are not parallelized
- case 04 and 11 are occasionally failing with the intel compilers (always when coming to the write-out routines)
Related:
- https://gi...- case 05 and 07 don't work with MPI in general as the used objective functions are not parallelized
- case 04 and 11 are occasionally failing with the intel compilers (always when coming to the write-out routines)
Related:
- https://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/issues/93
- https://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/issues/192
- https://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/merge_requests/28
- https://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/merge_requests/170wishlisthttps://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/issues/240Hourly discharge simulations require that provided Qobs file starts at hour 0...2024-02-26T09:47:22+01:00Oldrich RakovecHourly discharge simulations require that provided Qobs file starts at hour 00 and end at hour 23To print out hourly discharge simulations, current implementation requires that provided Qobs file starts at hour 00 and end at hour 23,
otherwise, mHM provides only daily Qobs file without the `subdaily_discharge` output file.
We wil...To print out hourly discharge simulations, current implementation requires that provided Qobs file starts at hour 00 and end at hour 23,
otherwise, mHM provides only daily Qobs file without the `subdaily_discharge` output file.
We will provide with @shresthp test datawishlistSebastian MüllerSebastian Müllerhttps://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/issues/210improve check case 04 impact2022-01-13T17:02:42+01:00Robert Schweppeimprove check case 04 impactI do not really know, what test case 4 is supposed to check, but the case could cover more than it does so far:
- share common L0 data (only works in current settings for version 5.x) -> reordering of domains
- multiple different land co...I do not really know, what test case 4 is supposed to check, but the case could cover more than it does so far:
- share common L0 data (only works in current settings for version 5.x) -> reordering of domains
- multiple different land cover periods -> change simulation periods
- all routing/hydrology resolution combinations
I would propose this for version 6.x, what do you think @muellese?6.xSebastian MüllerSebastian Müllerhttps://git.ufz.de/mhm/mhm/-/issues/164[CI] fails occasionally (mo_objective_function)2023-05-12T15:06:32+02:00Sebastian Müller[CI] fails occasionally (mo_objective_function)@kaluza and me (@muellese) noticed, that the gitlab CI fails occasionally, because it can't compile mhm since it is missing `mo_objective_function.mod`.
This happens for all compilers (gcc83, intel20, nag62 already reported)
This can b...@kaluza and me (@muellese) noticed, that the gitlab CI fails occasionally, because it can't compile mhm since it is missing `mo_objective_function.mod`.
This happens for all compilers (gcc83, intel20, nag62 already reported)
This can be fixed at occurrence with a retry or deleting the build folder on eve (`/public/mhm_runner/....`).
I am at my wit's end. At least for nowwishlist futureSebastian MüllerSebastian Müller